From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kirschner v. Fitzsimons

Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 22, 2022
142 S. Ct. 1128 (2022)

Summary

finding that "Trustee failed to plausibly allege that the intent of Tribune's senior management should be imputed to the Special Committee because the Trustee failed to allege that Tribune's senior management controlled the transfer of the property in question."

Summary of this case from Maxus Liquidating Tr. v. YPF S.A. (In re Maxus Energy Corp.)

Opinion

No. 21-1006

02-22-2022

Marc S. KIRSCHNER, Petitioner, v. Dennis J. FITZSIMONS, et al.


Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.


Summaries of

Kirschner v. Fitzsimons

Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 22, 2022
142 S. Ct. 1128 (2022)

finding that "Trustee failed to plausibly allege that the intent of Tribune's senior management should be imputed to the Special Committee because the Trustee failed to allege that Tribune's senior management controlled the transfer of the property in question."

Summary of this case from Maxus Liquidating Tr. v. YPF S.A. (In re Maxus Energy Corp.)

finding that "Trustee failed to plausibly allege that the intent of Tribune's senior management should be imputed to the Special Committee because the Trustee failed to allege that Tribune's senior management controlled the transfer of the property in question."

Summary of this case from Maxus Liquidating Tr. v. YPF S.A. (In re Maxus Energy Corp.)
Case details for

Kirschner v. Fitzsimons

Case Details

Full title:Marc S. KIRSCHNER, Petitioner, v. Dennis J. FITZSIMONS, et al.

Court:Supreme Court of the United States.

Date published: Feb 22, 2022

Citations

142 S. Ct. 1128 (2022)

Citing Cases

Woldemariam v. Azar

To determine whether granting leave to amend would be futile, we consider the proposed amendments and the…

Wade Park Land Holdings, LLC v. Kalikow

[W]hile the determination of whether reasonably equivalent value was exchanged is ‘largely a question of…