From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kirk v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Nov 4, 1953
261 S.W.2d 721 (Tex. Crim. App. 1953)

Opinion

No. 26471.

November 4, 1953.

Appeal from the District Court, McLennan County, D. W. Bartlett, J.

H. S. Beard, Pat Beard, Waco, for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State's Atty., of Austin, for the State.


The two prior opinions herein are withdrawn.

The offense is assault with intent to murder; the punishment, fifteen years.

In view of our disposition of this cause, a recitation of the facts is not deemed necessary.

Bill of exception No. 1 complains of the argument of the Assistant Criminal District Attorney in which he said: 'He (defendant) has been to the penitentiary before. I know. I sent him to the penitentiary and I also helped him get out of other trouble.'

We have carefully searched the record before us and fail to find any evidence that the prosecutor making this argument had ever helped the appellant out of any other trouble. When he made such argument the prosecutor injected a new and harmful fact into the case, in violation of Article 667, Vernon's Ann.C.C.P.

The appellant's second motion for rehearing is granted, and the judgment is now reversed and the cause remanded.


Summaries of

Kirk v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Nov 4, 1953
261 S.W.2d 721 (Tex. Crim. App. 1953)
Case details for

Kirk v. State

Case Details

Full title:KIRK v. STATE

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Nov 4, 1953

Citations

261 S.W.2d 721 (Tex. Crim. App. 1953)
159 Tex. Crim. 124

Citing Cases

Salas v. State

Appellant relies upon Benavides v. State, 111 Tex.Cr.R. 361, 12 S.W.2d 1031, which supports his contention.…

Lookabaugh v. State

We have consistently held that such conduct constitutes reversible error. See Kirk v. State, 159 Tex.Crim.…