From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kirby v. Brown

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Jun 19, 2013
529 F. App'x 828 (9th Cir. 2013)

Opinion

No. 13-15281 D.C. No. 2:13-cv-00021-LKK-JFM

06-19-2013

KAREN Y. KIRBY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr. and CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, Defendants - Appellees.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION


MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Lawrence K. Karlton, Senior District Judge, Presiding

Before: HAWKINS, GOULD and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiff Karen Kirby appeals pro se the district court's denial of her request for preliminary injunctive relief. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1), and we affirm.

Our sole inquiry is whether the district court abused its discretion in denying preliminary injunctive relief, and we conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, 555 U.S. 7, 24 (2008) (listing factors for district court to consider); Sports Form, Inc. v. United Press Int'l, 686 F.2d 750, 752-53 (9th Cir. 1982) (explaining limited scope of review).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Kirby v. Brown

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Jun 19, 2013
529 F. App'x 828 (9th Cir. 2013)
Case details for

Kirby v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:KAREN Y. KIRBY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr. and…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jun 19, 2013

Citations

529 F. App'x 828 (9th Cir. 2013)