From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kinnell v. State

Supreme Court of Kansas
Dec 9, 1972
210 Kan. 785 (Kan. 1972)

Opinion

No. 46,789

Opinion filed December 9, 1972.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

CRIMINAL LAW — Motion to Vacate Sentence — Abuse of Remedy.

Appeal from Bourbon district court, ROBERT F. STADLER, assigned judge. Opinion filed December 9, 1972. Affirmed.

Daniel F. Meara, of Meara Eichor, Fort Scott, was on the brief for appellant.

Vern Miller, attorney general, and Kenneth L. Briggs, county attorney, were on the brief for appellee.


This is an appeal by the petitioner in a proceeding instituted pursuant to K.S.A. 60-1507 from an order of the sentencing court dismissing the petition without a hearing and without appointing counsel for the petitioner.

The petitioner's original conviction in November, 1963, for the offenses of kidnapping in the first degree and forcible rape was affirmed on appeal in State v. Kinnell, 197 Kan. 456, 419 P.2d 870.

The motion here presented is the petitioner's fourth attack upon his sentence under 60-1507, supra. His first motion was dismissed because his direct appeal to this Court was still pending. His second was dismissed by the trial court and no appeal was taken. A third motion was filed in 1968 and again denied. On appeal it was affirmed in Kinnell v. State, 205 Kan. 445, 469 P.2d 348.

The trial court in its memorandum noted the petitioner had filed at least fifteen petitions for writs of habeas corpus and other relief in the federal courts.

The motion presently asserted by the petitioner to vacate his sentence under 60-1507, supra, is an abuse of remedy and was properly dismissed. ( Robinson v. State, 209 Kan. 667, 498 P.2d 35.)

The judgment of the lower court dismissing the proceeding is affirmed.


Summaries of

Kinnell v. State

Supreme Court of Kansas
Dec 9, 1972
210 Kan. 785 (Kan. 1972)
Case details for

Kinnell v. State

Case Details

Full title:DALE HOUSTON KINNELL, Appellant, v. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee

Court:Supreme Court of Kansas

Date published: Dec 9, 1972

Citations

210 Kan. 785 (Kan. 1972)
504 P.2d 161

Citing Cases

People v. Hubbard

People v. Scheer, 184 Colo. 15, 518 P.2d 833. See Sanders v. United States, supra; Murch v. Mottram, supra;…

Cox v. State

Hence he argues that his current motion was not an abuse of the remedy provided by K.S.A. 60-1507. The state…