From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

King v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
May 30, 2002
820 So. 2d 941 (Fla. 2002)

Opinion

No. SC01-1883.

May 30, 2002.

Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal — Certified Great Public Importance, Fifth District — Case No. 5D00-1518 (Orange County).

Neal T. McShane, Orlando, FL, for Petitioner.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Carmen F. Corrente, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, FL, for Respondent.


We initially accepted for review the decision of the Fifth District Court of Appeal in King v. State, 790 So.2d 477 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001), which certified conflict with Winter v. State, 781 So.2d 1111 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001), and certified the following question for review:

DOES THE OFFICE OF THE STATEWIDE PROSECUTOR HAVE JURISDICTION TO PROSECUTE A BURGLARY IN THE COUNTY IN WHICH IT WAS COMMITTED IF IT IS ALLEGED THAT THE BURGLARY WAS A PART OF A BUSINESS ENTERPRISE ENGAGED IN MULTI-CIRCUIT CRIMES?

Upon further consideration, we find that review was improvidently granted. Accordingly, this review proceeding is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS, and QUINCE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

King v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
May 30, 2002
820 So. 2d 941 (Fla. 2002)
Case details for

King v. State

Case Details

Full title:JAMES KING, Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: May 30, 2002

Citations

820 So. 2d 941 (Fla. 2002)

Citing Cases

Scott v. State

The supreme court ultimately dismissed review of King as improvidently granted (by unpublished order). King…

Scott v. State

The supreme court ultimately dismissed review of King as improvidently granted (by unpublished order). King…