From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

King v. Pelkofski

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 7, 1966
219 N.E.2d 884 (N.Y. 1966)

Opinion

Argued April 28, 1966

Decided July 7, 1966

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, JOHN P. COHALAN, JR., J.

John J. Boyle, James J. Weissman and John C. O'Malley for appellant-respondent.

Richard W. Walser and Howard J. Grace for respondent-appellant.


Appeals dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that the order appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution because it directs a remission to the Trial Term to ascertain the total of various items which gives plaintiff a lien upon the real estate. Appeals may be taken directly to this court from the determination hereafter to be made by the Trial Term.


Summaries of

King v. Pelkofski

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 7, 1966
219 N.E.2d 884 (N.Y. 1966)
Case details for

King v. Pelkofski

Case Details

Full title:ROSE KING, Appellant-Respondent, v. JOSEPH PELKOFSKI, Defendant, and…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jul 7, 1966

Citations

219 N.E.2d 884 (N.Y. 1966)
219 N.E.2d 884
273 N.Y.S.2d 438

Citing Cases

King v. Pelkofski

The Appellate Division reversed in a memorandum opinion, holding that, even though plaintiff's mortgage was…