From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

KIND v. BARRY

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Feb 1, 1910
66 Misc. 188 (N.Y. App. Term 1910)

Opinion

February, 1910.

Ellison, MacIntyre Davis (Arnold L. Davis, of counsel), for appellant.

Menken Brothers (Mortimer M. Menken and Howard T. Cole, of counsel), for respondent.


Defendant with others gave a power of attorney to three persons named, as his attorneys in fact. Plaintiff has recovered judgment against him upon a contract made by one only of the three. Presumptively such an authority was a joint one (Story Agency, § 42; Mechem Agency, § 77 and cases cited; Hawley v. Keeler, 53 N.Y. 114, 121); and there is nothing in the power of attorney to indicate the contrary, but much that is confirmatory. For this reason as well as that stated in Kind v. Cortis, decided herewith ( ante, p. 186), the judgment should be reversed and a new trial ordered.

SEABURY and GUY, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.


Summaries of

KIND v. BARRY

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Feb 1, 1910
66 Misc. 188 (N.Y. App. Term 1910)
Case details for

KIND v. BARRY

Case Details

Full title:JENNIE KIND, Respondent, v . JOHN T. BARRY, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term

Date published: Feb 1, 1910

Citations

66 Misc. 188 (N.Y. App. Term 1910)
121 N.Y.S. 324

Citing Cases

Unterberg v. Elder

It is true that the power of attorney recites that it is made "by and between each of the parties of the…

Unterberg v. Elder

No other evidence was offered by either party. It is on this meagre record that the case comes before us. An…