From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kinberg v. Garr

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 31, 2009
60 A.D.3d 597 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. 183.

March 31, 2009.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (George D. Salerno, J.), entered on or about October 29, 2007, which, to the extent appealed from, granted defendant's motion to dismiss, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Sara Kinberg, appellant pro se.

Ira E. Garr, New York, respondent pro se.

Before: Saxe, J.P., Buckley, McGuire, DeGrasse and Freedman, JJ.


The IAS court properly determined that plaintiff's breach of contract and fraud claims are essentially legal malpractice claims that are barred by the three-year statute of limitations ( see CPLR 214; Matter of R.M. Kliment Frances Halsband, Architects [ McKinsey Co., Inc.], 3 NY3d 538, 543).

The IAS court properly dismissed plaintiff's third cause of action alleging a breach of the retainer agreement and her sixteenth cause of action alleging a violation of Judiciary Law § 487. Those causes of action are based on issues that were fully litigated in prior actions and determined adversely to her. Thus, she may not revisit those issues in this action (see generally Melnitzky v LoPreto, 8 AD3d 4). We have considered and rejected plaintiff's other contentions.

[ See 17 Misc 3d 1116(A), 2007 NY Slip Op 52027(U).]


Summaries of

Kinberg v. Garr

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 31, 2009
60 A.D.3d 597 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

Kinberg v. Garr

Case Details

Full title:SARA KINBERG, Appellant, v. IRA E. GARR, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 31, 2009

Citations

60 A.D.3d 597 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 2473
874 N.Y.S.2d 907

Citing Cases

N.Y.S. Workers' Comp. Bd. v. Program Risk Mgmt., Inc.

1.Tort ClaimsRegardless of the manner of pleading, a claim arising out of the attorney-client relationship…

N.Y. Workers' Comp. Bd. v. Madden

The Court agrees. Regardless of the manner of pleading, a claim arising out of the attorney-client…