From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kimble v. Beckner

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Dec 17, 1986
806 F.2d 1256 (5th Cir. 1986)

Opinion

No. 86-3341. Summary Calendar.

December 17, 1986.

Clayton Kimble, pro se.

Donald L. Beckner, U.S. Atty., Richard B. Launey, Asst. U.S. Atty., Baton Rouge, La., for U.S. only.

Barbara L. Herwig, Appellate Div., Civil Div., Washington, D.C., for defendants-appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana.

Before POLITZ, WILLIAMS, and JONES, Circuit Judges.


Clayton Kimble, currently serving a life term in federal prison for conspiring to violate the civil rights of a person by murdering him, United States v. Kimble, 719 F.2d 1253 (5th Cir. 1983), filed the instant in forma pauperis suit against the presiding federal trial judge, the prosecutors, and several witnesses. The district court dismissed the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d), which provides for dismissal of IFP cases if the court is "satisfied that the action is frivolous or malicious." The district court found the action frivolous in light of the immunity given judicial officers in the performance of their duties, the affirmance of Kimble's conviction on direct appeal, and the rejection of a collateral attack under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. We affirm.

In Spears v. McCotter, 766 F.2d 179, 182 (5th Cir. 1985) ( quoting Watson v. Ault, 525 F.2d 886, 890 (5th Cir. 1976), we observed that "a decade ago Judge Bell of this court addressed the `difficult task facing the courts of winnow[ing] out the wheat from the unusual amount of chaff necessarily presented in a system which fosters pro se litigation.'" We there encouraged district courts to exercise their authority to avoid meritless litigation while preserving a forum for legitimate complaints. "District courts are vested with especially broad discretion in making the determination of whether an IFP proceeding is frivolous." Green v. McKaskle, 788 F.2d 1116, 1119 (5th Cir. 1986).

In the case at bar the district court acted within its discretion in dismissing the complaint. Indeed, that dismissal is a classic example of a proper dismissal of a frivolous or malicious complaint.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Kimble v. Beckner

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Dec 17, 1986
806 F.2d 1256 (5th Cir. 1986)
Case details for

Kimble v. Beckner

Case Details

Full title:CLAYTON KIMBLE, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. DONALD L. BECKNER, ET AL.…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Dec 17, 1986

Citations

806 F.2d 1256 (5th Cir. 1986)

Citing Cases

Smith v. RI Family Court

The First Circuit has held that the affirmative defense of the statute of limitations may justify dismissal…

Romano v. Wall

The First Circuit has held that the affirmative defense of the statute of limitations may justify dismissal…