From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kimble v. Am. First Ins. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Apr 28, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-67-JJB-SCR (M.D. La. Apr. 28, 2014)

Summary

denying remand where settlement demand sought exhaustion of policy limits of $100,000 and referenced allegedly similar cases, all of which had damage awards in amounts greater than $100,000, and subsequent settlement demand was for $95,000

Summary of this case from Akinkugbe v. Red Frog Events, LLC

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-67-JJB-SCR

04-28-2014

MICHAEL KIMBLE v. AMERICA FIRST INSURANCE COMPANY


RULING

The court has carefully considered the petition, the record, the law applicable to this action, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Riedlinger, dated April 4, 2014 (doc. no. 16). The objection filed by plaintiff restate prior arguments and lack merit for the reasons considered by the magistrate judge.

The court hereby approves the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge and adopts it as the court's opinion herein. Accordingly, plaintiff's Motion to Remand is DENIED.

Baton Rouge, Louisiana, this 28th day of April, 2014.

___________________

JAMES J. BRADY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Kimble v. Am. First Ins. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Apr 28, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-67-JJB-SCR (M.D. La. Apr. 28, 2014)

denying remand where settlement demand sought exhaustion of policy limits of $100,000 and referenced allegedly similar cases, all of which had damage awards in amounts greater than $100,000, and subsequent settlement demand was for $95,000

Summary of this case from Akinkugbe v. Red Frog Events, LLC

denying remand where settlement demand sought exhaustion of policy limits of $100,000 and referenced allegedly similar cases, all of which had damage awards in amounts greater than $100,000, and subsequent settlement demand was for $95,000

Summary of this case from Sampson v. Red Frog Events, LLC

denying remand where settlement demand sought exhaustion of policy limits of $100,000 and referenced allegedly similar cases, all of which had damage awards in amounts greater than $100,000, and subsequent settlement demand was for $95,000

Summary of this case from Cole v. Mesilla Valley Transp.

denying remand where settlement demand sought exhaustion of policy limits of $100,000 and referenced allegedly similar cases, all of which had damage awards in amounts greater than $100,000, and subsequent settlement demand was for $95,000

Summary of this case from Janko v. Fresh Mkt., Inc.

denying remand where settlement demand sought exhaustion of policy limits of $100,000 and referenced allegedly similar cases, all of which had damage awards in amounts greater than $100,000, and subsequent settlement demand was for $95,000

Summary of this case from Leonard v. Sentry Select Ins. Co.
Case details for

Kimble v. Am. First Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL KIMBLE v. AMERICA FIRST INSURANCE COMPANY

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Apr 28, 2014

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-67-JJB-SCR (M.D. La. Apr. 28, 2014)

Citing Cases

Woods v. Arch Ins. Co.

See, e.g., Grant v. Chevron Phillips Chemical Co., 309 F.3d 864, 869 (5th Cir. 2002) and De Aguilar, 47 F.3d…

Williams v. Miss. Farm Bureau Cas. Ins. Co.

See, e.g., Grant v. Chevron Phillips Chemical Co., 309 F.3d 864, 869 (5th Cir. 2002) and De Aguilar, 47 F.3d…