From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kimbell v. U.S.

U.S.
Oct 15, 1974
419 U.S. 833 (1974)

Summary

refusing to award throughput royalty in patent dispute because of relevant industry practice

Summary of this case from Cacique, Inc. v. Robert Reiser Co. Inc.

Opinion

No. 73-1733.

October 15, 1974.


C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 490 F. 2d 203.


Summaries of

Kimbell v. U.S.

U.S.
Oct 15, 1974
419 U.S. 833 (1974)

refusing to award throughput royalty in patent dispute because of relevant industry practice

Summary of this case from Cacique, Inc. v. Robert Reiser Co. Inc.
Case details for

Kimbell v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:KIMBELL ET UX. v. UNITED STATES

Court:U.S.

Date published: Oct 15, 1974

Citations

419 U.S. 833 (1974)

Citing Cases

F.T.C. v. Atlantic Richfield Co.

On the other hand, the difficulty of entry into a market to which Arco is neither committed not impelled, cf.…

United States v. Schwimmer

United States v. Salazar, 485 F.2d 1272, 1277 (2d Cir. 1973) [cert. denied, 415 U.S. 985, 94 S.Ct. 1579, 39…