From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kim v. U.S.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 28, 1995
903 F. Supp. 1546 (S.D.N.Y. 1995)

Summary

granting motion to vacate opinion and judgment where parties agreed to settle dispute after notice of appeal filed, and settlement was contingent on district court's vacatur

Summary of this case from Hospira, Inc. v. Sandoz Inc.

Opinion

No. 91 Civ. 1582 (LBS)

November 28, 1995

Healy Baillie, New York City, for Plaintiffs.

Frank W. Hunger, Assistant Attorney General, Mary Jo White, United States Attorney, Janis G. Schulmeisters, Attorney in Charge, Torts Branch, Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice, New York, for Defendant United States.


CONSENT ORDER AND JUDGMENT


1. WHEREAS, a trial in this matter was held on January 18, 19, 20, and 23, 1995; and

2. WHEREAS, by Opinion dated June 19, 1995, and Judgment dated July 24, 1995, this Court entered judgment in favor of plaintiffs and against the United States; and

3. WHEREAS, on September 21, 1995 the United States filed a Notice of Appeal; and

4. WHEREAS, the parties agree to settle this matter on the basis of the terms embodied in both this Consent Order and Judgment and a separate Settlement Agreement; and

5. WHEREAS, the parties' agreement is contingent upon the Court's approval of the Consent Order and Judgment; and

6. WHEREAS, defendant has moved this Court, without opposition by plaintiffs, pursuant to Rule 60(b)(6), Fed.R.Civ.P., to vacate its Opinion dated June 19, 1995 and its Judgment dated July 24, 1995; and

7. WHEREAS, the parties agree, on the terms set forth in both this Consent Order and Judgment and the separate Settlement Agreement, that the United States will pay plaintiffs One Hundred Seventy Eight Thousand Dollars ($178,000.00), without interest and without costs, in full settlement of this action; and

8. WHEREAS, upon the Court's approval of this Consent Order and Judgment, the United States shall promptly send the Consent Order and Judgment to the appropriate Government official for the drawing of a check on plaintiffs' behalf, to wit: To Order of "Healy Baillie, As Attorneys" for the amount of $178,000; and

9. WHEREAS, the parties agree that the United States will move to dismiss the appeal pending in the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, bearing Docket No. 95-6240, within 15 days of the Court's approval of this Consent Order and Judgment; it is

ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that plaintiffs recover of and from the United States of America the sum of $178,000.00, without interest and without costs, and that the check for said sum be made payable to the order of "Healy Baillie, As Attorneys"; and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that this Court's Judgment of July 24, 1995 is vacated; and that its Opinion dated June 19, 1995, published at 887 F. Supp. 701 (S.D.N.Y. 1995), is vacated in its entirety and shall be of no force and effect;

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Kim v. U.S.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 28, 1995
903 F. Supp. 1546 (S.D.N.Y. 1995)

granting motion to vacate opinion and judgment where parties agreed to settle dispute after notice of appeal filed, and settlement was contingent on district court's vacatur

Summary of this case from Hospira, Inc. v. Sandoz Inc.
Case details for

Kim v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:Jongsuk KIM, Yonho Seo, Myungran Kim, Dongwha Kim, Dongrim Kim, Dongsil…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Nov 28, 1995

Citations

903 F. Supp. 1546 (S.D.N.Y. 1995)

Citing Cases

Hospira, Inc. v. Sandoz Inc.

This Court sees no reason to obstruct the settlement achieved here. See Goldman v. Gen. Accident Ins. Co. of…