From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kim v. JP Morgan Chase Bank

Supreme Court of Michigan.
May 9, 2012
811 N.W.2d 498 (Mich. 2012)

Opinion

Docket No. 144690.COA No. 302528.

2012-05-9

EUIHYUNG KIM and In Sook Kim, Plaintiffs–Appellees, v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, Defendant–Appellant.


Prior report: 295 Mich.App. 200, ––– N.W.2d ––––.

Order

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration and the motion for leave to file brief amicus curiae are GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the January 12, 2012 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED, limited to the issues of whether the defendant acquired the plaintiffs' loan by operation of law, and, if so, whether MCL 600.3204(3) applies to acquisition of a mortgage by operation of law, and further, if the foreclosure procedures in this case were flawed, whether the foreclosure is void ab initio or voidable.

The Michigan Association of Bankers, the Real Property Law Section of the State Bar of Michigan, and the Consumer Law Section of the State Bar of Michigan are invited to file briefs amicus curiae. Other persons or groups interested in the determination of the issues presented in this case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.


Summaries of

Kim v. JP Morgan Chase Bank

Supreme Court of Michigan.
May 9, 2012
811 N.W.2d 498 (Mich. 2012)
Case details for

Kim v. JP Morgan Chase Bank

Case Details

Full title:EUIHYUNG KIM and In Sook Kim, Plaintiffs–Appellees, v. JP MORGAN CHASE…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan.

Date published: May 9, 2012

Citations

811 N.W.2d 498 (Mich. 2012)
491 Mich. 915

Citing Cases

Kim v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA

We granted its application.Kim v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, 491 Mich. 915, 811 N.W.2d 498 (2012).II.…