Opinion
No. 70300
07-13-2016
DAVID AUGUST KILLE, SR., Petitioner, v. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK, Respondent.
cc: David August Kille, Sr. Attorney General/Carson City Eighth District Court Clerk
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
This original pro se petition for a writ of mandamus challenges a district court order denying a motion for summary judgment.
Having considered the petition and the supporting documents, we are not persuaded that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is warranted. Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 679, 818 P.2d 849, 851, 853 (1991). Among other reasons, petitioner has an adequate remedy in the form of an appeal from a final judgment. Pan, 120 Nev. at 224, 88 P.3d at 841; see Consol. Generator-Nev., Inc. v. Cummins Engine Co., 114 Nev. 1304, 1312, 971 P.2d 1251, 1256 (1998) (recognizing that interlocutory orders may be challenged in the context of an appeal from a final judgment). Accordingly, we
ORDER the petition DENIED.
/s/_________, J.
Cherry /s/_________, J.
Douglas /s/_________, J.
Gibbons cc: David August Kille, Sr.
Attorney General/Carson City
Eighth District Court Clerk