From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kiker v. Worley

Supreme Court of Georgia
Oct 20, 1967
157 S.E.2d 745 (Ga. 1967)

Opinion

24345.

ARGUED OCTOBER 10, 1967.

DECIDED OCTOBER 20, 1967. REHEARING DENIED NOVEMBER 9, 1967.

Injunction. Gilmer Superior Court. Before Judge Pope.

Wright, Walther Morgan, Clinton J. Morgan, for appellants.

Herman J. Spence, P. T. McCutchen, for appellees.


In view of their laches, the plaintiffs were not entitled to an interlocutory injunction against the collection of taxes.

ARGUED OCTOBER 10, 1967 — DECIDED OCTOBER 20, 1967 — REHEARING DENIED NOVEMBER 9, 1967.


Denial of an interlocutory injunction against collection of ad valorem property taxes is the subject matter of this appeal.

On May 23, 1967, C. W. Kiker, Sr., and two other taxpayers filed their petition in Gilmer County against the sheriff and other county officials seeking, besides other relief, to prevent the collection form the plaintiffs of property taxes for 1966 over and above the amounts shown to be due by their 1966 tax returns. The plaintiffs contended in substance as follows: that the members of the Board of Tax Assessors were not legally appointed; that the tax receiver in taking 1966 tax returns did not administer an oath and did not furnish a list of questions to any taxpayer as required by law; that the $2,000 homestead exemption was applied against 40% of the actual value of real estate of taxpayers rather than against 100% of actual value as required; and that in stated particulars the tax officials improperly valued real and personal property throughout the county.

Upon the interlocutory hearing the trial court found against these contentions. Its judgment denying the injunction recited, among other matters, that the evidence showed that the 1966 tax digest for that county had been approved by the State Revenue Commissioner on December 20, 1966, that 96% of such 1966 taxes had been paid, and that 93.2% of all taxpayers of the county had paid their 1966 taxes.

This feature alone, as we appraise the numerous issues presented, is decisive. The plaintiffs' contentions involve not only their own taxes but the entire 1966 tax digest of the county. They did not file their suit until long after the State Revenue Commissioner had approved that digest pursuant to Code Ann. § 92-6917 (see Youmans v. Hamilton, 218 Ga. 402 ( 128 S.E.2d 151)), and after a vast majority of other taxpayers had voluntarily paid their 1966 taxes and hence could not recover them. See Mayor c. of Savannah v. Fawcett, 186 Ga. 132, 138 ( 197 S.E. 253). Under these circumstances the plaintiffs are guilty of laches and are not entitled to the relief they seek. Code § 55-108; 84 CJS 1163, Taxation, § 582(d). See also, Derrick v. Campbell, 219 Ga. 795 ( 136 S.E.2d 381).

Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur, except Undercofler, J., who is disqualified.


Summaries of

Kiker v. Worley

Supreme Court of Georgia
Oct 20, 1967
157 S.E.2d 745 (Ga. 1967)
Case details for

Kiker v. Worley

Case Details

Full title:KIKER et al. v. WORLEY, Sheriff, et al

Court:Supreme Court of Georgia

Date published: Oct 20, 1967

Citations

157 S.E.2d 745 (Ga. 1967)
157 S.E.2d 745

Citing Cases

Kiker v. Hefner

2. The motion for summary judgment is supported by evidence that at the time the petition for declaratory…

Kiker v. Hefner

On May 3, 1967, C.W. Kiker, plaintiff-appellant, filed suit in the Georgia state courts against the sheriff…