From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Keyes v. Kimmel

Court of Errors and Appeals
May 16, 1932
160 A. 684 (N.J. 1932)

Opinion

Submitted February 12, 1932 —

Decided May 16, 1932.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 9 N.J. Mis. R. 604.

For the respondents, Spindel Berr.

For the appellant, Kimmel Kimmel.


The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, BODINE, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, KERNEY, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Keyes v. Kimmel

Court of Errors and Appeals
May 16, 1932
160 A. 684 (N.J. 1932)
Case details for

Keyes v. Kimmel

Case Details

Full title:LUCY B. KEYES ET AL., RESPONDENTS, v. JESSE KIMMEL, APPELLANT

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: May 16, 1932

Citations

160 A. 684 (N.J. 1932)
109 N.J.L. 268

Citing Cases

Sharpe v. Talley

In Black's Law Dictionary, 256 (4th ed. 1951), "call" is defined as follows: "As used in contract, means…

Pollock v. Pollock

What elements were lacking, or in what other respects, if any, these instructions were defective or…