From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Key Enterprises of Delaware v. Venice Hosp

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nov 10, 1992
979 F.2d 806 (11th Cir. 1992)

Opinion

No. 89-3086.

November 10, 1992.

Christopher K. Kay, Michael J. Beaudine, Orlando, Fla., Anthony E. De Resta, Morris, Manning Martin, Atlanta, Ga., for plaintiff-appellant.

Herbert T. Schwartz, Reinman, Harrell, Graham, Mitchell Wattwood, Melbourne, Fla., for Venice Hosp., Medicare Patient AIDS Center.

Lynn Snyder, William G. Kopit, Washington, D.C., for Sammett Corp., Medicare Patient AIDS Center.

William G. Kopit, Florida Hosp. Assoc., Tallahassee, Fla., for appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC (Opinion December 28, 1990, 11th Cir., 1991, 919 F.2d 1550)

Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, FAY, KRAVITCH, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK and CARNES, Circuit Judges.

Senior U.S. Circuit Judge Thomas A. Clark has elected to participate in further proceedings in this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(c).


A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.


Summaries of

Key Enterprises of Delaware v. Venice Hosp

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nov 10, 1992
979 F.2d 806 (11th Cir. 1992)
Case details for

Key Enterprises of Delaware v. Venice Hosp

Case Details

Full title:KEY ENTERPRISES OF DELAWARE, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. VENICE…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit

Date published: Nov 10, 1992

Citations

979 F.2d 806 (11th Cir. 1992)

Citing Cases

Key Enterprises of Delaware, v. Venice Hosp

Following oral argument, a panel of this court reversed and directed the district court to enter judgment for…

Aquatherm Indus. v. Florida Power Light

603 F.2d at 275. In the single Eleventh Circuit case to consider the monopoly leveraging theory, Key…