From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Keurig, Inc. v. JBR, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Mar 12, 2014
558 F. App'x 1009 (Fed. Cir. 2014)

Opinion

2013-1478

03-12-2014

KEURIG, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JBR, INC. (doing business as Rogers Family Company), Defendant-Appellee.

MICHAEL A. ALBERT, Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C., of Boston, Massachusetts, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were GERALD B. HRYCYSZYN and CHELSEA A. LOUGHRAN. THOMAS M. PETERSON, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, of San Francisco, California, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief was DANIEL JOHNSON, JR.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts in No. 11-CV-11941, Judge F. Dennis Saylor, IV.

JUDGMENT

MICHAEL A. ALBERT, Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C., of Boston, Massachusetts, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were GERALD B. HRYCYSZYN and CHELSEA A. LOUGHRAN.

THOMAS M. PETERSON, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, of San Francisco, California, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief was DANIEL JOHNSON, JR. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, O'MALLEY, and CHEN, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

__________

Daniel E. O'Toole

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

Keurig, Inc. v. JBR, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Mar 12, 2014
558 F. App'x 1009 (Fed. Cir. 2014)
Case details for

Keurig, Inc. v. JBR, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:KEURIG, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JBR, INC. (doing business as…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Mar 12, 2014

Citations

558 F. App'x 1009 (Fed. Cir. 2014)

Citing Cases

In re Keurig Green Mountain Single-Serve Coffee Antitrust Litig.

In May 2013, the District Court for the District of Massachusetts granted Rogers' motion for summary…

Lanard Toys Ltd. v. Toys "R" Us-Del., Inc.

Upon review, however, the Court finds that the Federal Circuit has applied the definition of functionality on…