From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ketchens v. Rocha

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 6, 2006
1:05-cv-00131-OWW-LJO-P, Order Adopting findings and Recommendations (Doc. 12) (E.D. Cal. Aug. 6, 2006)

Opinion

1:05-cv-00131-OWW-LJO-P, Order Adopting findings and Recommendations (Doc. 12).

August 6, 2006


ORDER DISMISSING ACTION


Markus Ketchens ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On June 14, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and Recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within thirty (30) days. On July 13, 2006, plaintiff filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed June 14, 2006, are ADOPTED IN FULL; and,

2. This action is DISMISSED based on Plaintiff's failure to comply with 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) by not exhausting the available administrative remedies prior to filing suit.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Ketchens v. Rocha

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 6, 2006
1:05-cv-00131-OWW-LJO-P, Order Adopting findings and Recommendations (Doc. 12) (E.D. Cal. Aug. 6, 2006)
Case details for

Ketchens v. Rocha

Case Details

Full title:MARKUS KETCHENS, Plaintiff, v. ROCHA, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 6, 2006

Citations

1:05-cv-00131-OWW-LJO-P, Order Adopting findings and Recommendations (Doc. 12) (E.D. Cal. Aug. 6, 2006)

Citing Cases

Harris v. Escamilla

See Boyd v. Corr. Corp. of Am., 380 F.3d 989, 997-98 (6th Cir. 2004) (nonspecific allegations of fear do not…