From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kessler v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jul 17, 2002
820 So. 2d 459 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Opinion

No. 3D02-1690.

July 17, 2002.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Kevin Emas, Judge.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Howard K. Blumberg, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert E. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Michael J. Neimand, Assistant Attorney General (Fort Lauderdale), for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and GERSTEN, and FLETCHER, JJ.


CONFESSION OF ERROR


Appellant, Avira D. Kessler ("Defendant"), appeals a trial court order finding her in direct criminal contempt fourteen days after the alleged contempt occurred. We reverse.

As the State correctly concedes, the trial court failed to provide the defendant with notice and an opportunity to prepare a defense before the hearing at which the trial court found her guilty of direct criminal contempt. A trial court must give the alleged contemnor notice and an opportunity to prepare a defense when the act underlying the charge of direct criminal contempt occurs days before the hearing thereon. See Tejada v. State, 729 So.2d 965 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); Fox v. State, 490 So.2d 1288 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986). Since the trial court failed to do so, the order below must be reversed. Further contempt proceedings, if any, should be conducted as an indirect contempt.

Reversed.


Summaries of

Kessler v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jul 17, 2002
820 So. 2d 459 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)
Case details for

Kessler v. State

Case Details

Full title:AVIRA D. KESSLER, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jul 17, 2002

Citations

820 So. 2d 459 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)