From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kerr v. Bank of Am., N.A.

Supreme Court of Nevada.
Nov 14, 2012
381 P.3d 630 (Nev. 2012)

Opinion

No. 58346.

11-14-2012

Terry KERR, Appellant, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Respondent.

Terry Kerr Wright, Finlay & Zak, LLP/Las Vegas


Terry Kerr

Wright, Finlay & Zak, LLP/Las Vegas

ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

This is a proper person appeal from a district court summary judgment in a tort action. Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County; Patrick Flanagan, Judge.

Having reviewed the record and appellant's civil proper person appeal statement, we conclude that the district court properly granted respondent summary judgment because appellant failed to oppose the summary judgment motion. See Schuck v. Signature Flight Support, 126 Nev. ––––, ––––, 245 P.3d 542, 544 (2010) (explaining that when a party fails to make arguments against the grant of summary judgment in the district court, that party waives the right to make those arguments on appeal); see also DCR 13(3) (stating that a party's failure to oppose a motion is considered a consent to granting that motion). Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

We have considered appellant's remaining arguments on appeal and conclude that they lack merit.



Summaries of

Kerr v. Bank of Am., N.A.

Supreme Court of Nevada.
Nov 14, 2012
381 P.3d 630 (Nev. 2012)
Case details for

Kerr v. Bank of Am., N.A.

Case Details

Full title:Terry KERR, Appellant, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Respondent.

Court:Supreme Court of Nevada.

Date published: Nov 14, 2012

Citations

381 P.3d 630 (Nev. 2012)