From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Keough v. City of Denver

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Sep 15, 2014
Civil Action No. 13-cv-02485-REB-KLM (D. Colo. Sep. 15, 2014)

Summary

holding that lack of probable cause cannot be based on an unsubstantiated legal conclusion

Summary of this case from Parr v. Stevens

Opinion

Civil Action No. 13-cv-02485-REB-KLM

09-15-2014

CHRISTOPHER KEOUGH, Plaintiff, v. BENITA PACKARD, Sgt., and THE CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO, Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Blackburn, J.

The matter before me is the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [#50], filed August 25, 2014. No objections having been filed to the recommendation, I review it only for plain error. See Morales-Fernandez v. Immigration & Naturalization Service , 418 F.3d 1116, 1122 (10th Cir. 2005).

"[#50]" is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific paper by the court's case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I use this convention throughout this order.

Finding no error, much less plain error, in the magistrate judge's recommended disposition, I find and conclude that recommendation should be approved and adopted. As detailed in the magistrate judge's thorough analysis, the allegations of the Amended Complaint are patently insufficient to state plausible claims for violation of plaintiff's First or Fourth Amendment rights against defendant Benita Packard. She therefore is entitled to qualified immunity. Moreover, in the absence of any viable constitutional claim against Sergeant Packard, plaintiff's municipal liability against the City cannot survive. Defendants' motion to dismiss therefore must be granted and plaintiff's claims dismissed.

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. That the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [#50], filed August 25, 2014, is APPROVED AND ADOPTED as an order of this court;

2. That Defendants' Motion To Dismiss [#29], filed November 25, 2013, is GRANTED;

3. That plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE;

4. That the combined Trial Preparation Conference and Final Pretrial Conference set Friday, September 19, 2014, at 1:00 p.m., and the trial set to commence Monday, October 6, 2014, are VACATED; and

5. That judgment with prejudice SHALL ENTER on behalf of defendants, Sgt. Benita Packard and The City and County of Denver, against plaintiff, Christopher Keough, on all claims for relief and causes of action asserted in this action.

Dated September 15, 2014, at Denver, Colorado.

BY THE COURT:

_________

Robert E. Blackburn

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Keough v. City of Denver

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Sep 15, 2014
Civil Action No. 13-cv-02485-REB-KLM (D. Colo. Sep. 15, 2014)

holding that lack of probable cause cannot be based on an unsubstantiated legal conclusion

Summary of this case from Parr v. Stevens

finding that plaintiff's burden to plead the absence of probable cause could not be satisfied by an "unsubstantiated legal conclusion"

Summary of this case from Medina v. Danaher
Case details for

Keough v. City of Denver

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER KEOUGH, Plaintiff, v. BENITA PACKARD, Sgt., and THE CITY AND…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Sep 15, 2014

Citations

Civil Action No. 13-cv-02485-REB-KLM (D. Colo. Sep. 15, 2014)

Citing Cases

Parr v. Stevens

Thus, Plaintiff's conclusory and unsubstantiated assertions fail to provide sufficient factual background to…

Medina v. Danaher

Conclusory allegations that probable cause was lacking are insufficient to establish a constitutional…