From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kent v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
May 16, 1986
345 S.E.2d 669 (Ga. Ct. App. 1986)

Summary

In Kent v. State, 179 Ga. App. 131 (345 S.E.2d 669) (1986), we stated that the limited police powers of corrections officers "do not necessitate the imputation of possible bias as in the instance of full-time police officers" and that no evidence showed that the corrections officers "had ever participated in any criminal investigation or prosecution."

Summary of this case from Kier v. State

Opinion

72338.

DECIDED MAY 16, 1986.

Simple battery. Tattnall State Court. Before Judge Rahn.

Jack E. Carney, Jr., for appellants.

Bruce Daniel Dubberly, Jr., Solicitor, for appellee.


Three defendants appeal their convictions of a total of five counts of simple battery. Held:

Defendants contend that the trial court erred in refusing to dismiss from the jury panel for cause tow or more correctional officers. It has been held to be error to refuse to dismiss for cause full-time police officers because "[i]t is inherent in the nature of police duties and the closeness with which such officers are identified with criminal procedures that questions regarding possible bias, fairness, prejudice or impermissible influence upon jury deliberations inevitably arise. These questions cannot be erased by a mere subjective, albeit sincere, declaration by the officer that he or she can be fair and impartial as to a defendant." Hutcheson v. State, 246 Ga. 13, 14 (1) ( 268 S.E.2d 643). See also King v. State, 173 Ga. App. 838 ( 328 S.E.2d 740).

Correctional officers possess some police powers as provided by regulation. See OCGA § 42-5-35 and Official Compilation of Rules and Regulations of the State of Georgia, Rule 125-2-1-.09. However, such limited police powers do not necessitate the imputation of possible bias as in the instance of full-time police officers. There is no evidence that these correctional officers had ever participated in any criminal investigation or prosecution. Therefore, the case sub judice is distinguishable from Hutcheson v. State, 246 Ga. 13, 14 (1), supra. See Wilson v. State, 250 Ga. 630, 635 (4) ( 300 S.E.2d 640); Jordan v. State, 247 Ga. 328, 338-340 (6) ( 276 S.E.2d 224); Anderson v. State, 169 Ga. App. 729 (1), 730 ( 314 S.E.2d 735).

Judgment affirmed. Carley and Pope, JJ., concur.

DECIDED MAY 16, 1986.


Summaries of

Kent v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
May 16, 1986
345 S.E.2d 669 (Ga. Ct. App. 1986)

In Kent v. State, 179 Ga. App. 131 (345 S.E.2d 669) (1986), we stated that the limited police powers of corrections officers "do not necessitate the imputation of possible bias as in the instance of full-time police officers" and that no evidence showed that the corrections officers "had ever participated in any criminal investigation or prosecution."

Summary of this case from Kier v. State
Case details for

Kent v. State

Case Details

Full title:KENT et al. v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: May 16, 1986

Citations

345 S.E.2d 669 (Ga. Ct. App. 1986)
345 S.E.2d 669

Citing Cases

Woods v. State

Noting that "his sole function is administrative" and that he stated he could be fair and impartial towards…

Thompson v. State

However, this rule does not apply to corrections officers who do not have arrest powers. Kent v. State, 179…