From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kent v. County of Hudson

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Apr 3, 1969
251 A.2d 760 (N.J. 1969)

Opinion

Argued March 18 and March 31, 1969 —

Decided April 3, 1969.

Appeal from Superior Court, Appellate Division.

Mr. Daniel F. Gilmore argued the cause for appellant ( Mr. William F. Kelly, Jr., Hudson County counsel, attorney).

Mr. Lewis M. Holland argued the cause for respondent ( Messrs. Warren, Chasen, Leyner Holland, attorneys).


The Appellate Division reversed a judgment entered for the defendant on a jury verdict, 102 N.J. Super. 208 (1968). We granted defendant's petition for certification, 53 N.J. 23 (1968). We affirm substantially for the reasons given by the Appellate Division. The issue not having been raised, we express no view as to whether evidence of negligence exists in the present record.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN — 7.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Kent v. County of Hudson

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Apr 3, 1969
251 A.2d 760 (N.J. 1969)
Case details for

Kent v. County of Hudson

Case Details

Full title:HAZEL KENT, ADMINISTRATRIX AD PROSEQUENDUM OF JOHN F. CROSBY, DECEASED…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Apr 3, 1969

Citations

251 A.2d 760 (N.J. 1969)
251 A.2d 760

Citing Cases

Winters v. City of Jersey City

We disagree. Unquestionably, the Legislature intended to grant limited immunity to hospitals not operated for…

Winters v. Jersey City

We agree with the Appellate Division's opinion insofar as it rejected the defendant's attack on the jury's…