From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kenny v. Byrne

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Mar 8, 1978
75 N.J. 458 (N.J. 1978)

Summary

noting that the framers of the 1947 Constitution intended to create a "strong executive"

Summary of this case from Communications Workers v. Christie

Opinion

Argued November 28, 1977 —

Decided March 8, 1978.

On certification to the Superior Court, Appellate Division, whose opinion is reported at 144 N.J. Super. 243 (1976).

Mr. William S. Greenberg argued the cause for appellants ( Messrs. Greenberg and Mellk, attorneys.)

Mr. Stephen Skillman, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondents ( Mr. William F. Hyland, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; Mr. Michael A. Santaniello, Deputy Attorney General, on the brief).

Mr. Sanford Kluger argued the cause for amicus curiae Common Cause ( Mr. Henry Ramer, attorney).


The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division.

For affirmance — Chief Justices HUGHES and Justices MOUNTAIN, SULLIVAN, PASHMAN, CLIFFORD, SCHREIBER and HANDLER — 7.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Kenny v. Byrne

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Mar 8, 1978
75 N.J. 458 (N.J. 1978)

noting that the framers of the 1947 Constitution intended to create a "strong executive"

Summary of this case from Communications Workers v. Christie
Case details for

Kenny v. Byrne

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM E. KENNY AND CATHERINE McGOVERN HAVRILSKY, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Mar 8, 1978

Citations

75 N.J. 458 (N.J. 1978)
383 A.2d 428

Citing Cases

Shoemaker v. Handel

The state must use the narrowest means consistent with the maintenance of its legitimate interests. Martin,…

Perth Amboy Board of Education v. Christie

One method available for the Governor to ensure that the laws are "faithfully executed" is to issue an…