From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kennedy v. Wathen

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Sep 14, 2006
No. 02-06-268-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 14, 2006)

Opinion

No. 02-06-268-CV

Delivered: September 14, 2006.

Appeal from County Court at Law No. 2 of Wichita County.

Panel D: GARDNER, WALKER, and McCOY, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Appellant Ronald Kennedy, pro se, attempts to appeal from the trial court's order dismissing as frivolous his claims against Appellees. The trial court signed the order of dismissal on April 4, 2006, but Appellant did not file his notice of appeal until August 4, 2006, long after the applicable deadline. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1.

On August 7, 2006, we notified Appellant that we would dismiss this appeal unless he or any party desiring to continue the appeal filed a response by August 17, 2006. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a). We have received no response.

The times for filing a notice of appeal are jurisdictional in this court, and absent a timely filed notice of appeal, we must dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.1(b), 26.1; Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997). Because Appellant's notice of appeal was not timely filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f).


Summaries of

Kennedy v. Wathen

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Sep 14, 2006
No. 02-06-268-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 14, 2006)
Case details for

Kennedy v. Wathen

Case Details

Full title:RONALD KENNEDY, Appellant, v. R. WATHEN, DOROTHY THORTON, R. ROWE…

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth

Date published: Sep 14, 2006

Citations

No. 02-06-268-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 14, 2006)

Citing Cases

Williams's Estate

Such agreements have never been doubted as to the validity, especially where there has been actual delivery…

Philadelphia National Bank v. Buchman

The notations, endorsements and marks complained of upon one or more of the notes in suit are neither…