From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kendall v. State

Supreme Court of New Mexico
Mar 9, 1977
90 N.M. 191 (N.M. 1977)

Opinion

No. 11254.

March 9, 1977.

Jan Alan Hartke, Chief Public Defender, Reginald J. Storment, Appellate Defender, Santa Fe, for petitioner.

Toney Anaya, Atty. Gen., Santa Fe, for respondent.


OPINION


Defendant was convicted of fourteen felonies and one misdemeanor. The Court of Appeals affirmed in part and reversed in part. Kendall v. State, 90 N.M. 236, 561 P.2d 935 (Ct.App. 1977). We granted certiorari.

The only issue we entertain is the Court of Appeals' reversal of defendant's conviction of criminal sexual penetration because of the trial court's failure to instruct that the jury must find that the victim was other than defendant's spouse, and the resulting remand for new trial on the issue. The reversal was improper under the facts of the case. State v. Bell, 90 N.M. 134, 560 P.2d 925 (1977). The defendant was properly convicted of criminal sexual penetration, and his conviction is affirmed.

OMAN, C. J., and McMANUS, EASLEY and PAYNE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Kendall v. State

Supreme Court of New Mexico
Mar 9, 1977
90 N.M. 191 (N.M. 1977)
Case details for

Kendall v. State

Case Details

Full title:Danny Ray KENDALL, Petitioner v. STATE of New Mexico, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court of New Mexico

Date published: Mar 9, 1977

Citations

90 N.M. 191 (N.M. 1977)
561 P.2d 464

Citing Cases

State v. Espinosa

Whether one follows Section 31-18-16 (the present law), or NMSA 1953, Section 40A-29-3.1 (the law arguably in…

State v. Charlton

25 caliber semi-automatic handgun" to commit the crime. In State v. Kendall, 90 N.M. 236, 561 P.2d 935…