finding that provisions mandating forfeiture proceedings without jury trial violate neither the seventh amendment to the federal Constitution nor Georgia Constitution 1983, Art. I, Sec. I, Para. XI
Summary of this case from Matter of BellNo. 93-486.
December 6, 1993.
C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 985 F. 2d 1067.
finding that provisions mandating forfeiture proceedings without jury trial violate neither the seventh amendment to the federal Constitution nor Georgia Constitution 1983, Art. I, Sec. I, Para. XI
Summary of this case from Matter of Bellconstruing due process and equal protection rights embodied in Article 24 in pari materia with comparable rights in Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments
Summary of this case from Dipino v. Davisinvalidating ordinance imposing special restrictions on properties occupied by three to five unrelated persons registered as students at educational institutions on state and federal equal protection grounds
Summary of this case from Dvorak v. City of BloomingtonFull title:KELLY ET AL. v. MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FEN-NER SMITH, INC
Court:U.S.
Date published: Dec 6, 1993
FNFS, Ltd. v. Harwood (In re Harwood), 404 B.R. 366, 393 (Bankr. E.D. Tex. 2009) (citing LSP Inv. Partnership…
In re HarwoodHowever, the Fifth Circuit recognizes that the "technical" or "express" trust requirement is not limited to…