Opinion
Argued February 7, 1936 —
Decided May 14, 1936.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is printed in 13 N.J. Mis. R. 719.
For the respondent, Quinn, Parsons Doremus.
For the appellant, William F. Hanlon.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, LLOYD, CASE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.