From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kelley v. Whitaker

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Nov 6, 1974
211 S.E.2d 176 (Ga. Ct. App. 1974)

Opinion

49807.

SUBMITTED OCTOBER 7, 1974.

DECIDED NOVEMBER 6, 1974.

Discharge of executrix. McDuffie Superior Court. Before Judge Stevens.

Bobby G. Beazley, for appellant.

Albert H. Dallas, for appellee.


1. Appellant's sole enumeration of error "is not argued, or supported by citation of authority in the brief, and there was no oral argument in this case; therefore, it is deemed to have been abandoned. Andrew v. State, 229 Ga. 388, 389 ( 191 S.E.2d 841); Ezzard v. State, 229 Ga. 465 (1) ( 192 S.E.2d 374)." Rodriguez v. Newby, 131 Ga. App. 651, 655 (5) ( 206 S.E.2d 585).

2. "There being no `judgment for a sum certain, which has been affirmed' (Code § 6-1801), the motion for the assessment of damages under said Code section is hereby denied." Wright v. Collins, 117 Ga. App. 105, 106 (2) ( 159 S.E.2d 468).

Judgment affirmed. Bell, C. J., and Quillian, J., concur.

SUBMITTED OCTOBER 7, 1974 — DECIDED NOVEMBER 6, 1974.


Summaries of

Kelley v. Whitaker

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Nov 6, 1974
211 S.E.2d 176 (Ga. Ct. App. 1974)
Case details for

Kelley v. Whitaker

Case Details

Full title:KELLEY v. WHITAKER

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Nov 6, 1974

Citations

211 S.E.2d 176 (Ga. Ct. App. 1974)
133 Ga. App. 229

Citing Cases

Fraser v. Sun Valley, Inc.

Accordingly, we must deem it abandoned. Court of Appeals Rule 18 (c) (2); Code Ann. § 24-3618 (c) (2);…

Stinespring v. Fields

5. The remaining enumerations of error have been carefully considered with the exception of the last which…