From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kelley v. Kelley

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Aug 4, 1995
667 So. 2d 215 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Opinion

No. 94-2820.

August 4, 1995.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County; Ben Gordon, Judge.

Alice H. Murray of Moore, Kessler Moore, Niceville, for appellant.

Louis K. Rosenbloum of Levin, Middlebrooks, Mabie, Thomas, Mayes Mitchell, P.A., Pensacola, for appellee.


Appellant raises three issues on appeal, only one of which we find to have merit. While the trial court specifically stated that there was no reason to deviate from an equal division of the marital assets, the mathematical calculations within the final judgment demonstrate that the husband received a greater distribution of assets than the wife. In light of this apparent disparity, we must reverse and remand for redistribution of the marital assets. See Walton v. Walton, 657 So.2d 1214 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995). In all other respects, the final judgment is affirmed.

BOOTH, JOANOS and WOLF, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Kelley v. Kelley

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Aug 4, 1995
667 So. 2d 215 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)
Case details for

Kelley v. Kelley

Case Details

Full title:RITA FAYE KELLEY, APPELLANT, v. JAMES ROY KELLEY, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Aug 4, 1995

Citations

667 So. 2d 215 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Citing Cases

Doyle v. Doyle

On remand, the trial court must reconsider its equitable distribution plan in light of its stated intent of…