From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Keith v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc
May 7, 1986
721 S.W.2d 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1986)

Opinion

No. 792-85.

May 7, 1986.

Appeal from 263rd Judicial District, Harris County; Allen Stilley, judge.

Petition for discretionary review from Fourteenth Court of Appeals, 14th Supreme Judicial District.

George McCall Secrest, Jr., Houston, for appellant.

John B. Holmes, Jr., Dist. Atty., and Winston E. Cochran, Jr., and Eric Hagsteete, Asst. Dist. Attys., Houston, Robert Huttash, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.

Before the court en banc.


Both State's petitions for discretionary review refused.

McCORMICK, J., joined by ONION, P.J., and by CLINTON and TEAGUE, JJ., to part two of the dissenting opinion.


Because the majority refuses to examine the Court of Appeals' holding, I dissent.

Further, I would grant review on this Court's own motion and reform the judgment of the Court of Appeals to reflect only a reversal and remand. The Court of Appeals is without authority to remand the cause with instructions to the trial court to conduct an independent review of the evidence and determine whether a conviction upon criminally negligent homicide should be entered and upon an affirmative finding being made the trial court should then assess punishment. See Moss v. State, 574 S.W.2d 542 (Tex.Cr.App. 1978).

For these reasons, I dissent.

ONION, P.J., joins this dissenting opinion.

CLINTON and TEAGUE, JJ., join second part of this opinion.


Summaries of

Keith v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc
May 7, 1986
721 S.W.2d 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1986)
Case details for

Keith v. State

Case Details

Full title:Kenneth Arthur KEITH, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc

Date published: May 7, 1986

Citations

721 S.W.2d 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1986)

Citing Cases

Keith v. State

The Court of Appeals is without authority to remand the cause with instructions to the trial court to conduct…

In re the Matter of E.U.M

Evidence of recklessness has been held to be insufficient where an intoxicated person inside his home…