Keith Machinery Corp. v. South Plainfield

Full title: KEITH MACHINERY CORPORATION, A NEW YORK CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT…

Court: Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division

Date published: Jun 17, 1966

91 N.J. Super. 469 (App. Div. 1966)

221 A.2d 47

Opinion

Argued June 13, 1966 —

Decided June 17, 1966.

On appeal from the Superior Court, Law Division, Middlesex County.

Before Judges CONFORD, KILKENNY and LEONARD.

Mr. John T. Keefe argued the cause for appellants ( Mr. Edward J. Santoro, attorney).

Mr. Robert Silver argued the cause for respondent ( Messrs. Bilder, Bilder, Silver McCurley, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed essentially for the reasons stated by Judge Gerofsky in his opinion.