From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kearns v. Caraway

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio
Nov 12, 2008
No. 04-08-00245-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 12, 2008)

Opinion

No. 04-08-00245-CV

Delivered and Filed: November 12, 2008.

Appealed From the 131st Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, Trial Court No. 2007-CI-13911, Honorable Barbara Hanson Nellermoe, Judge Presiding.

DISMISSED

Sitting: ALMA L. LÓPEZ, Chief Justice, CATHERINE STONE, Justice, STEVEN C. HILBIG, Justice.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Michael Joseph Kearns's appellant's brief was originally due July 31, 2008. We granted Kearns extensions until September 29, 2008, to file the brief. The brief was not filed by the due date. Therefore, on October 8, 2008, we ordered Kearns to file, no later than October 20, 2008, his appellant's brief and a written response reasonably explaining his failure to timely file the brief. We further advised Kearns that if he failed to file a brief and the written explanation by the date ordered, we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a). Neither have been filed.

We therefore order this appeal dismissed for want of prosecution. We further order that appellee, Sundok Lee Caraway, recover her costs in this appeal from Michael Joseph Kearns.


Summaries of

Kearns v. Caraway

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio
Nov 12, 2008
No. 04-08-00245-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 12, 2008)
Case details for

Kearns v. Caraway

Case Details

Full title:Michael Joseph KEARNS, Appellant v. Sundok Lee CARAWAY, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio

Date published: Nov 12, 2008

Citations

No. 04-08-00245-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 12, 2008)

Citing Cases

Stonum v. Davis

Until it issues the fee is in the government which by the patent passes it to the grantee and he is entitled…