From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kearney v. Macy

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Apr 25, 1969
409 F.2d 847 (9th Cir. 1969)

Opinion

No. 23327.

April 25, 1969.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; Charles A. Ferguson, Judge.

Tony Geram, Fontana, Cal., Wirin, Rissman, Okrand Posner, Fred Okrand, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.

Carolyn M. Reynods, Asst. U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., Wm. D. Ruckelshaus, Asst. Atty. Gen., Washington, D.C., for appellee.

Before MERRILL, KOELSCH and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges.


The motion of appellee for summary affirmance is granted on the authority of United Public Workers of America v. Mitchell, 1947, 330 U.S. 75, 67 S.Ct. 556, 91 L.Ed. 754. In our opinion, that case, insofar as it deals with an employee of the United States government such as appellant Kearney, and with a violation of the Hatch Act of the type that Kearney was found to have committed, has not been overruled either expressly or by implication by subsequent decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Kearney v. Macy

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Apr 25, 1969
409 F.2d 847 (9th Cir. 1969)
Case details for

Kearney v. Macy

Case Details

Full title:James T. KEARNEY, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John W. MACY, Jr., and…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Apr 25, 1969

Citations

409 F.2d 847 (9th Cir. 1969)

Citing Cases

Swinney v. Untreiner

Northern Virginia Regional Park Authority v. U.S. Civil Service Commission, 437 F.2d 1346 (C.A. 4th), cert.…

Northern Va. Reg. Pk. v. U.S. Civ. Serv

In the case at hand, the appellants have cited no Supreme Court case since 1947 dealing specifically either…