From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kearney v. Gvgha

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 20, 1985
115 A.D.2d 960 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Summary

holding private attending physicians at a hospital that are not employed by that hospital could nevertheless lead to respondeat superior liability under the “degree of control” test, but that the degree of control is an issue of fact

Summary of this case from Robles v. Holy See (Vatican City)

Opinion

December 20, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Monroe County, Patlow, J.

Present — Dillon, P.J., Hancock, Jr., Callahan, Pine and Schnepp, JJ. [ 125 Misc.2d 716.]


Order unanimously affirmed, with costs to respondents (see, Watkins v Fromm, 108 A.D.2d 233).


Summaries of

Kearney v. Gvgha

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 20, 1985
115 A.D.2d 960 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

holding private attending physicians at a hospital that are not employed by that hospital could nevertheless lead to respondeat superior liability under the “degree of control” test, but that the degree of control is an issue of fact

Summary of this case from Robles v. Holy See (Vatican City)
Case details for

Kearney v. Gvgha

Case Details

Full title:PATRICIA P. KEARNEY, Individually and as Executrix of ROBERT KEARNEY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 20, 1985

Citations

115 A.D.2d 960 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

Robles v. Holy See (Vatican City)

It is clear, however, that New York courts use the “degree of control” test generally for this proposition…