From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kearney v. Fischer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 8, 2008
51 A.D.3d 1185 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. 503597.

May 8, 2008.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Thomas A. Kearney, Comstock, petitioner pro se.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, Albany (Martin A. Hotvet of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Rose, Lahtinen and Stein, JJ.


During a routine cell bar check, an altered keyboard was confiscated from petitioner and secured in the facility's contraband room. Based upon confidential information that was thereafter obtained, the keyboard was X-rayed and then taken apart, revealing two homemade plexiglas weapons which had been hidden inside. As a result, petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with possession of weapons and smuggling. At the conclusion of the ensuing tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of both charges. That determination was affirmed upon administrative appeal and petitioner thereafter commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding.

We confirm. Substantial evidence in the form of the misbehavior report and testimony adduced at the hearing supports the determination of guilt ( see Matter of Wilson v Goord,

47 AD3d 1102, 1102-1103). Petitioner's claim that the weapons were "planted" inside the keyboard by correction officers after it had been confiscated from his cell, along with his retaliation defense, created credibility issues for resolution by the Hearing Officer ( see Matter of Pulliam v Goord, 45 AD3d 1158, 1158). Furthermore, contrary to petitioner's assertion, the Hearing Officer was not required to independently assess the credibility of the confidential information which prompted the search of the keyboard inasmuch as it was not considered in determining petitioner's guilt ( see Matter of Davis v Selsky, 270 AD2d 548, 548).

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Kearney v. Fischer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 8, 2008
51 A.D.3d 1185 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

Kearney v. Fischer

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of THOMAS A. KEARNEY, Petitioner, v. BRIAN FISCHER, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: May 8, 2008

Citations

51 A.D.3d 1185 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 4258
856 N.Y.S.2d 740

Citing Cases

Muller v. Fischer

We confirm. The misbehavior report, together with the testimony of the authoring correction officer who…

Shepherd v. Fischer

60 AD3d 1247, 1248; Matter of Davis v Prack, 58 AD3d at 977). Furthermore, while we agree with petitioner…