From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kearney v. Fahey

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 26, 2004
2004 N.Y. Slip Op. 50400 (N.Y. App. Term 2004)

Opinion

2002-1746 N C.

Decided February 26, 2004.

Appeal by defendant from a small claims judgment of the District Court, Nassau County (D. Gross, J.), entered June 20, 2002, in favor of plaintiff in the principal sum of $1,865.73.

Judgment unanimously reversed without costs and action dismissed.

PRESENT: McCABE, P.J., LIFSON and SKELOS, JJ.


Plaintiff, having been reimbursed under the collision rider of her insurance policy for the damages to her vehicle less her deductible, was not entitled to maintain this action against defendant for her alleged negligence absent proof of a release from her insurance company and notification that it was not pursuing its subrogation claim ( see 71 NY Jur 2d, Insurance § 2173; 11 NYCRR 216.7 [g] [3-6]).


Summaries of

Kearney v. Fahey

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 26, 2004
2004 N.Y. Slip Op. 50400 (N.Y. App. Term 2004)
Case details for

Kearney v. Fahey

Case Details

Full title:COLLEEN KEARNEY, Respondent, v. JOANNE FAHEY, Appellant

Court:Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 26, 2004

Citations

2004 N.Y. Slip Op. 50400 (N.Y. App. Term 2004)

Citing Cases

Sch. Dist. of the City of Niagara Falls v. Crosspointe, LLC

CrossPointe further argues that Niagara Falls should not be able to claim as damages any expenses it incurred…

Sch. Dist. of the City of Niagara Falls v. Crosspointe, LLC

6. But CrossPointe misunderstands this Court's previous ruling. It is beyond dispute that CPLR § 4545 and the…