From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Keane v. Ranbar Packing, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 23, 1986
121 A.D.2d 601 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Opinion

June 23, 1986

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Levine, J.).


On the court's own motion, the appellant's notice of appeal is treated as an application for leave to appeal from so much of the order as denied that branch of its motion which was for a further deposition of the plaintiff guardian Michael Keane, said application is referred to Justice Eiber, and leave to appeal is granted by Justice Eiber.

Order modified, by deleting the provision thereof which denied that branch of Ranbar's motion which was for a further deposition of the plaintiff guardian Michael Keane, and substituting therefore a provision granting that branch of the motion to the extent of permitting a further deposition of Michael Keane on the limited issue of the family's medical history. As so modified, order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs to the appellant. Said deposition shall be conducted at a time and place set forth in a written notice of not less than 10 days to be given by the appellant, or at such time and place as the parties may agree.

The appellant failed to move to strike this case from the Trial Calendar within 20 days of service upon it of the note of issue (22 N.Y.CRR former 675.3; now 22 NYCRR 202.21 [e]). Therefore, since its late motion failed to allege "unusual and unanticipated" circumstances or advance a showing of irreparable prejudice and merit to its defense by one with personal knowledge of the facts, no further discovery may be granted to the appellant (22 N.Y.CRR former 675.7; now 22 NYCRR 202.21 [d]). In any case, the appellant has not shown that the additional discovery requested was material and necessary to its defense (see, e.g., Allen v. Crowell-Collier Pub. Co., 21 N.Y.2d 403).

The appellant is entitled, however, to a further examination as a continuation of a first examination of Michael Keane on the limited issue of the family's medical history, due to the conduct of the plaintiff's counsel in preventing this disclosure during Mr. Keane's first examination and his refusing to obtain a judicial ruling at that time (22 N.Y.CRR former 675.6; now 22 NYCRR 202.21 [d]). Gibbons, J.P., Eiber, Kunzeman and Kooper, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Keane v. Ranbar Packing, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 23, 1986
121 A.D.2d 601 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)
Case details for

Keane v. Ranbar Packing, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:BRIAN KEANE, by His Guardian MICHAEL KEANE, et al., Respondents, v. RANBAR…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 23, 1986

Citations

121 A.D.2d 601 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Citing Cases

Vanarthros v. St. Francis Hospital

Moreover, St. Francis failed to demonstrate that the former and current representation by Wilson, Elser of…

Stella v. Ahmed

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs. A party who seeks discovery after…