From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kaymakcian v. Charles

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 18, 2008
49 A.D.3d 407 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Summary

In Kaymakcian v. Bd. of Managers of the Charles House Condo., 49 A.D.3d 407 (1st Dept. 2008), the court applied the continuing wrong doctrine where there were “recurring leaks” about which plaintiffs “repeatedly notified” the defendants, which did not fix them.

Summary of this case from Dubuisson v. National Union Fire Insurance of Pittsburgh, P.A.

Opinion

No. 3095.

March 18, 2008.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Leland DeGrasse, J.), entered April 13, 2007, which, to the extent appealed from, granted respondents' motion for summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs' first cause of action for breach of fiduciary duty as barred by the statute of limitations, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion denied, and the cause of action reinstated to the extent indicated herein.

Roy P. Kozupsky Associates, LLP, New York, (William P. Walzer of counsel), for appellants.

Thomas D. Hughes, New York (Richard C. Rubinstein of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, Williams, Buckley and Acosta, JJ.


Dismissal of the breach of fiduciary duty claim as time-barred was improper where, pursuant to the condominiums' bylaws, respondents had a continuing duty to repair the building's limited common elements, including the terrace of the apartment directly above plaintiffs, which was the source of the subject recurring leaks. Respondents' failure to do so, despite being repeatedly notified by plaintiffs, constituted a continuing wrong that "is not referable exclusively to the day the original wrong was committed" ( see 1050 Tenants Corp. v Lapidus, 289 AD2d 145, 146). However, inasmuch as plaintiffs are seeking monetary damages, the claim is limited to any alleged damages that occurred within three years of the commencement of the instant action ( see Kaufman v Cohen, 307 AD2d 113, 118; CPLR 214).

We have considered respondents' remaining arguments, including that the complaint fails to allege specific facts to assert a breach of fiduciary duty cause of action, and find them unavailing.


Summaries of

Kaymakcian v. Charles

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 18, 2008
49 A.D.3d 407 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

In Kaymakcian v. Bd. of Managers of the Charles House Condo., 49 A.D.3d 407 (1st Dept. 2008), the court applied the continuing wrong doctrine where there were “recurring leaks” about which plaintiffs “repeatedly notified” the defendants, which did not fix them.

Summary of this case from Dubuisson v. National Union Fire Insurance of Pittsburgh, P.A.

continuing failure to repair a terrace

Summary of this case from Federal Ins. Co. v. Disting. Properties Umb. MGR

continuing failure to repair a terrace

Summary of this case from Federal Ins. v. Distinguished Properties Umbrella
Case details for

Kaymakcian v. Charles

Case Details

Full title:ELEONORE KAYMAKCIAN et al., Appellants, v. BOARD OF MANAGERS OF THE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 18, 2008

Citations

49 A.D.3d 407 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 2487
854 N.Y.S.2d 52

Citing Cases

Paris Suites Hotel, Inc. v. Seneca Ins. Co., Inc.

ecover damages for professional malpractice against an architect for defective design or construction accrues…

Paris Suites Hotel, Inc. v. Seneca Ins. Co.

t an architect for defective design or construction accrues upon the actual completion of the work to be…