From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kaufman v. International Business Machines Corp.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 20, 1984
61 N.Y.2d 930 (N.Y. 1984)

Opinion

Decided March 20, 1984

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, John G. Connor, J.

Melvin M. Kaufman, appellant pro se. Edward G. Imperatore for respondent.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division ( 97 A.D.2d 925). Plaintiff's complaint and submissions in response to defendant's motion to dismiss pursuant to CPLR 3211 (subd [a], par 7) have demonstrated that plaintiff has not stated a cause of action against defendant for which the requested relief can be granted. (See Davis v Williams, 59 A.D.2d 660, affd 44 N.Y.2d 882.)

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, JONES, MEYER, SIMONS and KAYE concur; Judge WACHTLER taking no part.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.4), order affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum.


Summaries of

Kaufman v. International Business Machines Corp.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 20, 1984
61 N.Y.2d 930 (N.Y. 1984)
Case details for

Kaufman v. International Business Machines Corp.

Case Details

Full title:MELVIN M. KAUFMAN, Appellant, v. INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 20, 1984

Citations

61 N.Y.2d 930 (N.Y. 1984)
474 N.Y.S.2d 721
463 N.E.2d 37

Citing Cases

Vanderwoude v. Post/Rockland Associates

Thus, a new hearing was required before the Local Laws, as altered, could become effective. Although these…

Valdez v. Northeast Brooklyn Hous. Dev. Corp.

. "Bare conclusory allegations are insufficient to support a motion for a preliminary injunction" ( Kaufman…