From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kaufman Satran v. Sidbern Estates, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 17, 2004
4 A.D.3d 454 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

2003-00546.

Decided February 17, 2004.

In an action to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendants Sidbern Estates, Inc., Hevrat Kiryat Neve Itzchak, Ltd., and Parcels 103 and 104 In Block 3709, Ltd., appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Franco, J.), dated December 12, 2002, which granted the plaintiff's motion for leave to enter a default judgment against them upon their failure to appear or answer and denied their cross motion, in effect, to vacate their default and to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against them on the grounds of forum non conveniens and another action pending.

Carl M. Kuntz, New York, N.Y., for appellants.

Adam B. Kaufman, Garden City, N.Y., for respondent.

Before: FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT and BARRY A. COZIER, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is denied, the cross motion is granted, the complaint is dismissed insofar as asserted against the appellants, and the action against the remaining defendants is severed.

A party seeking to vacate a default in appearing or answering must make a showing of a justifiable excuse for the default, and a meritorious defense ( see Hazen v. Bottiglieri, 286 A.D.2d 708; Miles v. Blue Label Trucking, 232 A.D.2d 382). In the instant case, the appellants made a sufficient showing of both a justifiable excuse and a meritorious defense. In addition, there was no prejudice to the plaintiff as a result of the relatively short delay.

The appellants were entitled to dismissal of the complaint insofar as asserted against them since the plaintiff's application to recover the same legal fee was still pending in a New York County action ( see CPLR 3211[a][4]).

SANTUCCI, J.P., GOLDSTEIN, SCHMIDT and COZIER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Kaufman Satran v. Sidbern Estates, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 17, 2004
4 A.D.3d 454 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

Kaufman Satran v. Sidbern Estates, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:KAUFMAN SATRAN, LLP, respondent, v. SIDBERN ESTATES, INC., ET AL.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 17, 2004

Citations

4 A.D.3d 454 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
771 N.Y.S.2d 693

Citing Cases

Smolka Co. Inc. v. Brown

" Pursuant to CPLR § 5015, a moving party seeking to vacate a default judgment must demonstrate both an…

R.U.M.C. Realty v. JCF Assoc., LLC

Pursuant to CPLR § 5015, a moving party seeking to vacate a default judgment must demonstrate both an…