From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Katz v. S.W.S. Building Corp.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jan 15, 1937
161 Misc. 777 (N.Y. App. Term 1937)

Opinion

January 15, 1937.

Appeal from the City Court of City of New York, County of New York.

Bernhard Singman [ Albert P. Singman of counsel], for the appellant.

Jenkins, Dimmick Finnegan [ William B. Shelton of counsel], for the respondent.


The papers show that the stenographer was permitted to go to the jury room, after the jury had retired, and to read to the jury a portion of the charge, without the knowledge or consent of counsel. This is too serious an infraction of fundamental safeguards to be condoned.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs.

All concur. Present — LYDON, LEVY and HAMMER, JJ.


Summaries of

Katz v. S.W.S. Building Corp.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jan 15, 1937
161 Misc. 777 (N.Y. App. Term 1937)
Case details for

Katz v. S.W.S. Building Corp.

Case Details

Full title:BERNARD I. KATZ, Appellant, v. S.W.S. BUILDING CORPORATION, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Jan 15, 1937

Citations

161 Misc. 777 (N.Y. App. Term 1937)
293 N.Y.S. 287

Citing Cases

Southern Pacific Railroad Co. v. Mitchell

The crucial question remains, were defendants prejudiced as a result thereof and did the trial court abuse…