From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Katsnelson v. Elrac, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 14, 2003
304 A.D.2d 619 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2001-10641

Submitted March 19, 2003.

April 14, 2003.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (M. Garson, J.), dated October 17, 2001, which denied their motion to vacate a prior order of the same court, dated June 27, 2001, granting the defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint upon the plaintiffs' failure to oppose the motion.

Ofshtein Ross, P.C., Brooklyn, N.Y. (Melissa Betancourt of counsel), for appellants.

Christopher A. Jeffreys, P.C., Melville, N.Y. (Edward J. Savidge of counsel), for respondent.

Before: SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, J.P., GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, HOWARD MILLER, REINALDO E. RIVERA, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

To vacate their default in opposing the defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint, plaintiffs had to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for their default and a meritorious cause of action (see Melo v. Pagano, 297 A.D.2d 717; see also Burns v. Casale, 276 A.D.2d 734). As the plaintiffs did neither, the Supreme Court properly denied their motion to vacate their default.

FEUERSTEIN, J.P., GOLDSTEIN, H. MILLER and RIVERA, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Katsnelson v. Elrac, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 14, 2003
304 A.D.2d 619 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Katsnelson v. Elrac, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:BORIS KATSNELSON, ET AL., appellants, v. ELRAC, INC., ET AL., respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 14, 2003

Citations

304 A.D.2d 619 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
757 N.Y.S.2d 475

Citing Cases

Pyatigorsky v. Derbaremdiker

In Eretz Funding, Ltd. v. Shalosh Associates, 266 AD2d 184, 185 (2nd Dept 1999), the Court instructed that,…

Parine v. Country Farms Equestrian Center

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs. To succeed on their motion, in effect, to vacate the order…