From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Karell v. West

Supreme Court of Texas
Mar 10, 1982
628 S.W.2d 48 (Tex. 1982)

Opinion

No. C-546.

January 20, 1982. Rehearing Denied March 10, 1982.

Appeal from District Court, Tarrant County, Artell M. Young, J.

Callaway Marshall, Clyde M. Marshall, Jr., Fort Worth, for petitioners.

John McLain, Frank D. McCown, Fort Worth, for respondents.


Plaintiffs Rena West and Bob Shobert filed this suit in trespass to try title to a 3.783 acre tract of land in Tarrant County. They also sued for damages for the removal of sand and topsoil from the tract. The defendants, Dorothea Karell and husband, George Karell, answered by a plea of not guilty and also by a plea that they had perfected limitations title. The jury refused to find that the Karells had perfected title by adverse possession. The court of civil appeals held that the plaintiffs had proved title to the land, but it reformed the judgment by reducing the monetary award to the amount plaintiffs had alleged. 616 S.W.2d 692.

The opinion of the court of civil appeals states that Z. T. Slaughter, one of plaintiffs' predecessors in title, had perfected title by limitations as appeared from an affidavit the plaintiffs introduced into evidence. Our search of the record shows that the plaintiffs proved their title by a regular chain of title out of a common source and that the affidavit was not, as the opinion may suggest, an essential link in the plaintiffs' chain of title. Slaughter was in plaintiffs' unbroken chain of title as a grantee and later as a grantor. Plaintiffs' title did not rest upon adverse possession by a predecessor.

The application for writ of error is refused, no reversible error.


Summaries of

Karell v. West

Supreme Court of Texas
Mar 10, 1982
628 S.W.2d 48 (Tex. 1982)
Case details for

Karell v. West

Case Details

Full title:Dorothea F. KARELL et vir., Petitioners, v. Rena WEST et al., Respondents

Court:Supreme Court of Texas

Date published: Mar 10, 1982

Citations

628 S.W.2d 48 (Tex. 1982)

Citing Cases

State v. McNamara

Error is only committed when the verdict is coerced by the trial court. Karell v. West, 616 S.W.2d 692 (Tex.…

STATE v. FOOL BULL

Error is only committed when the verdict is coerced by the trial court." State v. McNamara, 325 N.W.2d 288,…