From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Karam v. Dept. of Envir. Protection

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Feb 24, 1999
157 N.J. 187 (N.J. 1999)

Opinion

Argued February 1, 1999.

Decided February 24, 1999.

Appeal from the Superior Court, Appellate Division.

Richard M. Hluchan, argued the cause for appellants ( Levin Hluchan, attorneys; Richard S. Morrison, on the briefs).

Alyssa Pearlman Wolfe, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondents (Peter Verniero, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; Mary C. Jacobson, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel).

Michael J. Gross, submitted a brief on behalf of amicus curiae, National Association of Home Builders ( Giordano, Halleran Ciesla, attorneys.).


The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Baime's opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 308 N.J. Super. 225, 705 A.2d 1221 (1998).

For affirmance — Chief Justice PORITZ and Justices HANDLER, POLLOCK, O'HERN, GARIBALDI, STEIN, and COLEMAN — 7.

Opposed — None.


Summaries of

Karam v. Dept. of Envir. Protection

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Feb 24, 1999
157 N.J. 187 (N.J. 1999)
Case details for

Karam v. Dept. of Envir. Protection

Case Details

Full title:EDMUND T. KARAM AND BARBARA KARAM, HUSBAND AND WIFE…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Feb 24, 1999

Citations

157 N.J. 187 (N.J. 1999)
723 A.2d 943

Citing Cases

United Prop. Owners v. Borough of Belmar

Although plaintiffs' "investment-backed expectations" are a relevant consideration in determining economic…

Twp. of Montville v. Lotta Lettuce J.T.S. Farms, LLC

Even if its claim were properly and timely presented, Lotta Lettuce never proved its entitlement to inverse…