From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Karagozian v. USV Optical, Inc.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Feb 27, 2019
331 Conn. 904 (Conn. 2019)

Opinion

02-27-2019

Ohan KARAGOZIAN v. USV OPTICAL, INC.

John R. Williams, in support of the petition. Elizabeth M. Lacombe and Robert M. Palumbos, pro hac vice, in opposition.


The plaintiff's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 186 Conn.App. 857, 201 A.3d 500 (2019), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court correctly construe and apply Brittell v. Department of Correction, 247 Conn. 148, 717 A.2d 1254 (1998), in holding that an action for constructive discharge in violation of public policy requires that the plaintiff allege and prove not only that the employer intended to create an intolerable work atmosphere but that the employer intended thereby to force the plaintiff to resign?"


Summaries of

Karagozian v. USV Optical, Inc.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Feb 27, 2019
331 Conn. 904 (Conn. 2019)
Case details for

Karagozian v. USV Optical, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Ohan KARAGOZIAN v. USV OPTICAL, INC.

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Feb 27, 2019

Citations

331 Conn. 904 (Conn. 2019)
201 A.3d 1023

Citing Cases

Karagozian v. USV Optical, Inc.

The plaintiff then petitioned this court for certification to appeal, which we granted on one issue: "Did the…