From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kanne v. Connecticut General Life Ins. Co.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jul 23, 1987
823 F.2d 284 (9th Cir. 1987)

Opinion

Nos. 85-5641, 85-5642.

July 23, 1987.

Leonard Sacks, Encino, Cal., Carol A. Hay, and Andrew O. Feringa, Lakewood, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellees-appellants.

James S. Cline, Suzette Clover, David L. Bacon, and Bruce A. Beckman, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendants-appellants-appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; Edward Rafeedie, District Judge.

Before FLETCHER and PREGERSON, Circuit Judges and WILKINS, District Judge.

Hon. Philip C. Wilkins, Senior United States District Judge, for the Eastern District of California, sitting by designation.


ORDER

The parties shall submit simultaneous briefs of not more than thirty (30) pages by August 17, 1987, addressing two issues:

1) Whether the insurance policy in question is a plan governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1001, et seq., and

2) Whether Cal.Ins.Code § 790.03(h)(2) is preempted by ERISA.

Oral argument may be scheduled at a later date.

This court's opinion, filed June 4, 1987, 819 F.2d 204, is hereby withdrawn.


Summaries of

Kanne v. Connecticut General Life Ins. Co.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jul 23, 1987
823 F.2d 284 (9th Cir. 1987)
Case details for

Kanne v. Connecticut General Life Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:THEODORE KANNE AND BEATRIZ KANNE, PLAINTIFFS AND APPELLEES, v. CONNECTICUT…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jul 23, 1987

Citations

823 F.2d 284 (9th Cir. 1987)

Citing Cases

Kanne v. Connecticut General Life Ins. Co.

(d) Nothing in this subchapter shall be construed to alter, amend, modify, invalidate, impair, or supersede…

Kanne v. Connecticut General Life Ins. Co.

(d) Nothing in this subchapter shall be construed to alter, amend, modify, invalidate, impair, or supersede…