Kane v. Tennis

Full title: MARK KANE, Petitioner v. FRANKLIN TENNIS, et al., Respondents

Court: United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Sep 29, 2010

CIVIL ACTION No. 09-3610 (E.D. Pa. Sep. 29, 2010)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION No. 09-3610.

September 29, 2010

ORDER

EDMUND LUDWIG, Senior District Judge

AND NOW, this 29^th day of September, 2010, upon careful and independent consideration of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Timothy R. Rice, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED Objections are overvaled.

2. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED with prejudice.

3. There is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability.

4. The Clerk of the Court shall mark this case closed for statistical purposes.