From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kancharla v. Applied Cybernetics Intl

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 10, 1998
247 A.D.2d 260 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

February 10, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Beatrice Shainswit, J.).


The motion was properly granted on the grounds that plaintiff's facially valid affidavits of service in both the Florida and New York actions were not adequately rebutted by defendants' bare assertions of improper service (see, Levin v. Dorrian, 171 A.D.2d 415). Defendants' remaining contentions are without merit.

Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Ellerin, Nardelli and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

Kancharla v. Applied Cybernetics Intl

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 10, 1998
247 A.D.2d 260 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Kancharla v. Applied Cybernetics Intl

Case Details

Full title:RAMGOPAL KANCHARLA, Respondent, v. APPLIED CYBERNETICS INTERNATIONAL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 10, 1998

Citations

247 A.D.2d 260 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
668 N.Y.S.2d 360